9, February 2026
Yaoundé: Security strains, political tensions cloud potential papal visit 0
Cameroon’s possible inclusion in the itinerary of Pope Leo XIV’s first African trip is drawing growing debate, as security concerns, political tensions and moral objections raise questions about whether the country is ready for a papal visit. While Cameroon has been rumored as a potential stop, no visit has been confirmed, even as Leo has accepted invitations to Equatorial Guinea and Angola, with Algeria being a desired stop as well.
Cameroon’s leading political scientist and expert on security, Kinang Derick, suggested that the nation is simply not yet prepared to host the pontiff safely. In a conversation with OSV News, the scholar said that the immense strain on Cameroon’s security infrastructure, following the contested Oct. 12, 2025, presidential election, could be a major stumbling block.
“Cameroon is just coming out from an electoral year in which a lot of resources have been used to ensure the security of the electoral process,” Derick told OSV News.
“The government might have not recovered sufficiently enough to still have what it takes to put the necessary resources to ensure the pope’s security,” he explained.
Leo’s first trip to Africa as pontiff has had some locations confirmed, with the of Equatorial Guinea being the latest confirmed stop. A series of recent announcements by bishops in Angola and Algeria have indicated that Leo will embark on trips to their respective countries this year.
Cardinal Jean-Paul Vesco of Algiers told journalists outside the Paul VI audience hall Jan. 8 that he discussed the possibility of a trip with the pope during the extraordinary consistory and that the visit was “on track.”
On Jan. 13, Angola was announced as another destination that Leo intends to visit this year. At a press conference in Luanda, Polish Archbishop Kryspin Witold Dubiel, apostolic nuncio to Angola, announced that the pope had accepted the invitation from Church and government officials to visit.
While Cameroon was for weeks rumoured as a possible destination, Derick told OSV News the nation’s security forces, both materially and in terms of manpower, are exhausted, compounded by ongoing instability in the two English-speaking regions, as well as Boko Haram incursions in the country’s far-northern region.
Cameroon’s two English-speaking regions have been gripped by separatist violence since 2017, when the government took a hard line following strikes by Anglophone teachers and lawyers.
The expert noted that the severe insecurity in these regions makes a papal trip “logistically and practically impossible at this time.”
He also touched on general infrastructural decay, citing poor road networks and inadequate health facilities in major cities as issues that must be addressed before Cameroon hosts the pontiff.
“You don’t certainly want the pope to move on bumpy roads, or to land on outdated airstrips,” Derick noted.
While a papal visit would certainly be good for strengthening the faiths of Cameroon’s Catholics, estimated at 38.3% of the country’s 30.1 million inhabitants, the government also views such a visit as a critical piece of diplomatic victory — one that would boost Cameroon’s battered image abroad.
The country has been the object of increasing international criticism as a result of gross human rights violations. According to Amnesty International, people critical of the regime face persecution and are threatened with restrictions on their right to freedom of movement. Journalists are intimidated by security forces.
The country’s image was further dented by the Oct. 12, 2025, presidential election. President Paul Biya, in power for 43 years, was declared the winner, extending his rule by another seven years. The main opposition leader, Issa Tchiroma, rejected the results and has since continued to claim that he is the duly elected president.
Furthermore, a prominent Cameroonian Jesuit priest and scholar has publicly urged the pontiff not to visit the West African country, warning that such a visit could be an endorsement of a regime whose legitimacy has been shattered by a recent “grave political and moral crisis.”
In an open letter addressed to the Holy Father, Fr. Ludovic Lado recalled that the latest election was “marred by massive fraud” to ensure the continued rule of 92-year-old Biya. The contested results, he argued, have triggered a painful post-electoral crisis marked by violence, deaths and severe repression.
“The dozens of victims counted were killed by bullets fired at unarmed civilians by an army that has become a militia under the control of one man,” Lado wrote in his letter to the pontiff, adding that the situation in the country is “tragically demonstrating the lack of regard for the dignity of human life in our country, especially that of the poorest.”
Lado argued that a papal visit would betray the pope’s core preference for helping the poor, and instead provide a platform for “an aging elite” — living in “comfort and luxury, almost in another world compared to ordinary people” — clinging to power.
He feared the trip would be instrumentalized by “illegitimate government seeking respectability.”
In a dramatic appeal, the Jesuit priest said, “the hands of the members of Paul Biya’s regime that You will be shaking during Your visit to Cameroon, like those of Herod and Pilate, are stained with the blood of poor Cameroonians, victims of political repression.”
He also highlighted the unresolved Anglophone crisis that killed at least 6,500 people over the last decade.
Instead of a pastoral visit, Lado suggested the Holy See could play a crucial role as a mediator for peace, proposing Vatican support for an initiative led by the Italian Community of Sant’Egidio to help the nation find a path out of its “historical impasse.”
A papal visit should only take place when Cameroon regains “a climate of justice, peace and reconciliation, with legitimate authorities,” he concluded.
Political analyst Derick, however, disagreed that the papal visit could be seen as an endorsement of the political power in the country, and he framed the pope’s potential mission as one of pastoral care and pacification.
“It will not be an endorsement of the present regime. It will be more of a visit to a suffering people, a visit to a category of faithful within the Roman Catholic Church that are in need of their spiritual father to come and tap them on the back and to make them understand all is well, that God has not forgotten Cameroonians,” he told OSV News.
He drew parallels to other international journeys carried out by late Pope Francis, when he visited crisis zones like Congo and the Central African Republic, noting that the pontiff historically travels to places of turmoil to bring hope and advocate for peace, not to validate political leadership.
If the Cameroon leg of the tour is finalized, Leo would become the third pontiff to visit the central African nation, following Pope St. John Paul II in August 1985 and Pope Benedict XVI in March 2009 — all under the same Cameroonian ruler.
Culled from National Catholic Reporter



















9, February 2026
How Cameroon pays the price for disrespecting contracts 0
Contracts are not threats to sovereignty. They are instruments of credibility.
A state that cannot keep its word cannot build an economy. A government that treats contracts as politics invites bankruptcy.
International tribunals ask only one question:
Did the State respect its obligations?
And increasingly, Cameroon is forced to answer:
No
Nkongho Felix Agbor (“Agbor Balla”)
Lawyer and Human Rights Advocate
In Cameroon, public authorities often behave as though contracts are optional documents — instruments that can be suspended, modified, or terminated at will, depending on political convenience or changes in leadership. At home, such decisions may appear cost-free. Officials feel untouchable, shielded by weak institutions, political influence, and a culture of impunity.
But beyond Cameroon’s borders lies a different reality: a global legal system where contracts are enforceable, states are accountable, and breaches are punished not by speeches, but by billions in damages.
Every time Cameroon fails to respect a contract or abrogates one without due process, it exposes itself to international arbitration, costly litigation, massive compensation awards, reputational damage, and long-term economic loss.
And the bill is paid not by ministers — but by citizens.
The International System Cameroon Cannot Escape
Most major state contracts especially in infrastructure, mining, energy, telecommunications, aviation, and public-private partnerships — include international dispute resolution clauses.
These typically refer disputes to institutions such as the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), and the OHADA Common Court of Justice and Arbitration (CCJA).
Once Cameroon signs such contracts, it waives part of its sovereignty. It accepts that foreign tribunals — not Cameroonian authorities — will judge disputes.
There is no political protection at these forums.
No presidential decree.
No “high instructions”.
Only law. Evidence. And consequences.
Practical Cameroonian Examples: When the State Pays
1. The Antonio Conceição Case: Over 1 Billion FCFA
Perhaps the clearest recent example is the dismissal of football coach Antonio Conceição.
After leading the Indomitable Lions to third place at AFCON 2021, Conceição was dismissed without following contractual procedures. FIFA and later the Swiss Federal Tribunal ruled in his favour.
Cameroon was ordered to pay over 1.6 million euros — more than 1 billion FCFA.
The State eventually had to pay to avoid international sanctions.
This was not a football issue.
It was a contract law failure paid from public funds.
2. The Olembe Stadium and Magil: Over 15 Billion FCFA Frozen
The construction of the Olembe Sports Complex in Yaoundé has become a textbook case of how infrastructure contracts turn into financial disasters.
Following disputes with the contractor, Magil Construction, the matter went to international arbitration in Paris.
Cameroon was ordered to deposit more than 15 billion FCFA into an escrow account.
That is 15 billion francs blocked — not for hospitals, not for schools, not for roads but locked in a legal dispute.
3. The SGS Dispute – A Current Risk
Cameroon is currently facing a serious contractual crisis involving SGS, the Swiss multinational responsible for inspection and verification services linked to customs and trade.
SGS operates at the heart of Cameroon’s revenue system.
Recent administrative attempts to suspend or alter this contract without transparent legal process risk triggering international arbitration.
If this happens, Cameroon faces:
• Compensation claims
• Lost profit damages
• Years of interest
• Millions in legal fees
• Possible seizure of state assets abroad
To his credit, the Prime Minister has intervened to seek an institutional solution. This is welcome.
But the SGS episode illustrates a deeper problem:
in Cameroon, contracts are often treated politically first — and legally later.
At international level, SGS is not dealing with a ministry.
It is dealing with the Republic of Cameroon.
And the Republic cannot hide behind circulars.
The Dangerous Illusion of Domestic Power
Cameroonian officials often behave as if:
“What happens in Yaoundé stays in Yaoundé.”
This is false.
A contract signed in Yaoundé is enforceable in Paris, London, Washington, and The Hague.
A minister/Director may feel powerful locally.
But internationally, Cameroon is just another debtor.
Law Is Cheaper Than Arbitration
Good governance is cheaper than litigation.
Dialogue is cheaper than damages.
Due process is cheaper than seizure.
The paradox is brutal:
Cameroon spends more money fighting contracts than honouring them.
Conclusion: Sovereignty Without Law Is Poverty
Contracts are not threats to sovereignty.
They are instruments of credibility.
A state that cannot keep its word cannot build an economy.
A government that treats contracts as politics invites bankruptcy.
International tribunals ask only one question:
Did the State respect its obligations?
And increasingly, Cameroon is forced to answer:
No.
Written and edited by Barrister Agbor Balla