7, February 2019
UK: Prime Minister May planning to delay second Brexit vote 0
British Prime Minister Theresa May has reportedly decided to delay next week’s parliamentary vote on her Brexit deal out of fears that she will not be able to renegotiate a deal with the European Union (EU) by then.
May’s chief whip, Julian Smith, signaled at a cabinet meeting on Tuesday that the second vote on the divorce agreement would be delayed until the end of February to buy the PM enough time to strike a deal with the bloc in time, the Telegraph newspaper reported late on Wednesday, without citing its sources.
The vote on a new deal is now being planned for the week beginning Feb. 25, just over a month before Britain is due to leave the EU on March 29, according to the report.
Last month, May suffered a humiliating defeat at the House of Commons after lawmakers overwhelmingly rejected her original deal, urging her to make changes to the treaty.
The EU, however, has ruled out renegotiation for major changes.
European Council President Donald Tusk said Wednesday that the bloc will make no new offers.

He went as far as implying that supporters of Brexit deserved a “special place in hell” for promoting the exit “without even a sketch of a plan how to carry it out safely.”
May is due in the EU capital Brussels on Thursday to warn EU leaders that they should either accept legally binding changes to the Irish border arrangements, the main bone of contention in the deal, or risk a disorderly no-deal Brexit.R
The Telegraph reported on Tuesday that the cabinet had discussed delaying Brexit by no less than eight weeks.
Corbyn sets out conditions to support May’s deal
Meanwhile, Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, a firm critic of May’s handling of Brexit, said Wednesday that he would back a Brexit deal if it addresses his five key demands.
In a letter to the embattled PM, Corbyn said his party desired a UK-wide customs union and close alignment with the EU single market after the divorce.
He also called for “dynamic alignment” with the bloc on citizens’ rights and protections, “clear commitments” on future participation in various EU agencies and funding programs and “unambiguous agreements” on the terms of post-Brexit security arrangements with the bloc.
He made it clear that “simply seeking modifications” to the Irish border arrangements was not a sufficient response.
Corbyn said the EU would accept the UK’s demands for change if London changed its Brexit red lines.
Presstv













11, February 2019
Trial of Catalan separatist leaders puts Spanish state on the defensive 0
As 12 Catalan separatist leaders prepare to go on trial in Madrid, Spain has been forced to defend the independence and impartiality of its courts.
Catalan separatists have dismissed the high-profile trial which begins Tuesday at Spain’s Supreme Court as a “farce” whose outcome is already pre-determined.
Not so, says the government, which has published a thick file to show Spain’s justice system is just as fair as its European counterparts, citing rankings by the European Commission, the European Court of Human Rights and Transparency International.
Supreme Court President Carlos Lesmes points out that if the justice system really was not independent, the king’s brother-in-law would not be in jail for corruption, nor would a court ruling have sparked a no-confidence motion that brought down the conservative government in June.
“I think this will be the most important trial we’ve had in democracy,” he told reporters before the start of the trial. “It’s a challenge because there’s been a big smear campaign of Spain’s judiciary.”
State on trial?
Spain has had a long-standing public perception that its judiciary is biased.
In the EU’s 2018 “Justice Scoreboard”, Spain came sixth to last among 28 member states for public perception of the independence of judges and courts, behind Poland and Hungary.
Despite repeated denials, the conservative government in power at the time of Catalonia’s attempt to break from Spain in October 2017 and the Socialists that took power in June have each been accused of exerting pressure on judges.
“It is the state which will end up in the dock,” one of the main defendants on trial, former Catalan vice president Oriol Junqueras, predicted from pre-trial detention. Junqueras and 11 others are on trial for their role in the attempt to break from Spain.
Separatists call them “political prisoners” who are suffering oppression of the kind experienced in Spain during Francisco Franco’s 1939-75 dictatorship.
‘Unacceptable interference’
In a ruling, Spain’s Supreme Court said the group were not on trial for their ideas. The majority of the defendants were “political leaders who were members of the government of an autonomous region and therefore the highest representatives of the (Spanish) state in Catalonia”, it said.
The government has also had to defend itself from accusations that it put pressure on judges during the criminal investigation phase. Public prosecutors accuse nine of the 12 of rebellion, which implies the use of violence a key charge which has divided Spanish legal experts.
But the state attorney decided in November to only accuse them of the lesser crime of sedition. This has led conservative opposition parties, which take a hard line against Catalan separatism, to accuse the government of “unacceptable interference” in the case.
They suspect the move was part of a bid by Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez’s minority government to win the much-needed support in parliament of Catalan separatist parties for its 2019 budget.
Justice Minister Dolores Delgado, though, said Spain’s new state attorney took the decision “without the government imposing anything”.
European courts
In November, a conservative senator, Ignacio Cosido, also contributed to perception that the judiciary is biased.
On WhatsApp, he welcomed the promotion of Manuel Marchena a judge seen as close to the conservatives who will be presiding at the separatists’ trial at the head of the Supreme Court.
Cosido said it would allow the conservatives to “control” the court “behind the scenes.” After the controversy this generated, Marchena gave up the promotion.
Courts in Belgium, Germany and Switzerland have also contributed to doubts about Spain’s legal system by refusing to extradite separatists who had escaped after the declaration of independence.
A German court for instance last year refused to send former Catalan leader Carles Puigdemont back to Spain on rebellion charges.
A Belgian court meanwhile has agreed to consider a civil lawsuit filed by Puigdemont’s lawyers against Supreme Court judge Pablo Llarena, accusing him of [lacking] impartiality in the case against the Catalan separatist leaders.
Spain has not publicly criticised these decisions. “Our best communication campaign will be the trial,” said Lesmes.
(AFP)