17, July 2026
Cameroon cracks down on UAE Gold smuggling costing $3.5 billion 0
The Cameroonian government has launched a sweeping offensive against systemic fraud in its gold mining sector, revealing a massive international smuggling network that has siphoned billions from the national treasury. The crackdown exposes severe discrepancies between officially declared domestic production and the enormous volumes of gold arriving in the United Arab Emirates from Cameroonian borders.
The scale of the illicit financial flow highlights a continent-wide crisis in resource governance. Much like the regulatory battles waged by Kenya’s Ministry of Mining to control artisanal gold smuggling along the Kakamega-Migori greenstone belt, Cameroon’s aggressive intervention underscores the desperate need for African nations to reclaim sovereignty over their extractive industries.
The Staggering Discrepancy In Data
The trigger for the nationwide crackdown stems from a shocking revelation buried in the 2023 Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) report. According to Cameroon’s Directorate General of Customs, the nation officially exported a meager 22.3 kilograms of gold throughout the entire year. However, cross-referenced international trade data presented a radically different reality: foreign jurisdictions, predominantly the UAE, reported importing 15.2 tonnes of gold with its origin explicitly traced back to Cameroon.
Acting Minister of Mines, Industry and Technological Development, Fuh Calistus Gentry, addressed the media in Yaoundé, confirming the devastating economic impact of this parallel market. Authorities calculate that the unchecked export of gold to Dubai’s booming refineries has cost the Cameroonian state approximately CFA 2,000 billion (USD 3.5 billion, equivalent to KES 455 billion) in lost tax revenue over the past five years.
“The main problem does not necessarily lie in the disappearance of gold belonging to the state, but in the under-reporting of part of the production by certain private operators,” Minister Gentry noted, pointing to a sophisticated system of corporate tax evasion rather than simple border smuggling.
Targeting The Semi-Mechanized Miners
In response to the hemorrhage of resources, President Paul Biya ordered immediate investigations into the smuggling rings, prompting the Ministry of Mines to shutter nearly 200 illegal mining companies predominantly operating in the resource-rich East and Adamawa regions. Official intelligence indicates that over 95 percent of these identified illicit operations are run by foreign nationals who exploit loosely regulated artisanal frameworks.
To reopen, suspended operators are now subjected to rigorous new regulatory thresholds. The government has mandated the introduction of minimum gold delivery quotas—demanding a baseline production declaration of 5 kilograms per month for companies operating five production units. Furthermore, operators must transition entirely to closed-circuit processing systems within six months to ensure complete ore traceability and prevent environmental devastation from mercury runoff.
Environmental Bonds: Defiant companies must now pay a mandatory environmental bond of CFA 63 million (KES 14.3 million) to guarantee the rehabilitation of destroyed landscapes.
Permit Abuse: The government identified rampant abuse of exploration permits, which are strictly meant for assessing deposits, being illegally utilized to conduct full-scale commercial extraction.
Judicial Action: The Ministry confirmed that 137 specific cases involving unauthorized mining activities have already been forwarded to competent courts for criminal prosecution.
Global Parallels In The Fight For Traceability
Cameroon’s struggle is emblematic of a broader global challenge. The UAE has increasingly become the epicenter for African gold, absorbing hundreds of tonnes of metal sourced through opaque supply chains from countries like Sudan, Mali, and Zimbabwe. By tightening controls, Cameroon aims to disrupt the upstream entry points of these illicit flows.
The situation resonates deeply across East Africa. The Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) and the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) face similar challenges tracking revenues from the artisanal sectors in Western Kenya, where informal brokers buy raw gold at depressed prices and smuggle it out via porous borders to global refining hubs. Cameroon’s decision to enforce a minimum delivery threshold offers a potential regulatory blueprint for Kenya and Tanzania to formalize their artisanal output and capture lost foreign exchange.
The Economic Stakes for Yaoundé
Having adopted a comprehensive new mining code in 2023, Cameroon is aggressively banking on the exploitation of its vast reserves of gold, cobalt, diamonds, and iron to diversify an economy heavily reliant on crude oil. However, as the 15-tonne discrepancy proves, legislative codes are meaningless without robust enforcement mechanisms at the extraction sites.
As the Ministry of Mines deploys police and military units to forcefully dismantle non-compliant gold-bearing gravel processing units, the message to international investors is clear: the era of extracting Cameroonian wealth under the guise of artisanal exploration has officially ended.
Source: Sreamlinefeed.com


















17, July 2026
Ngoh Ngoh-Nathalie Moudiki: Cameroon cannot afford governance by rival fiefdoms 0
The spectacle unfolding around two competing refinery and oil depot projects is more than a bureaucratic disagreement. It is a disturbing illustration of a governance culture in which competing centers of power appear to be pursuing parallel agendas, with little regard for coherence, transparency or the national interest.
When infrastructure projects worth millions of dollars become associated primarily with the influence of powerful individuals rather than with a clearly articulated national energy strategy, the real loser is Cameroon. Whether one project is perceived to enjoy the backing of Nathalie Moudiki at the Société Nationale des Hydrocarbures (SNH) and the other the support of Ferdinand Ngoh Ngoh at the Presidency matters less than the broader institutional failure such perceptions reveal. Public investment should never be reduced to a contest of political patrons.
Cameroon has long spoken of strengthening its refining capacity, improving fuel security and expanding strategic petroleum storage. These are legitimate national priorities that deserve careful planning, rigorous technical evaluation and transparent procurement. Instead, the public is left watching what increasingly resembles a contest between rival power blocs. Such a situation raises uncomfortable questions. Is the country following a single energy policy or are major projects being driven by competing networks of influence? Who ultimately decides national priorities? And on what criteria?
This is not merely an issue of political optics. It is an economic one. Investors seek predictability, consistency and institutional clarity. Development partners expect governments to speak with one voice. When conflicting projects emerge simultaneously without a clear explanation of how they fit within a unified national framework, confidence is inevitably weakened. Every unnecessary duplication, every delay born of institutional rivalry and every opaque decision carries a financial cost that is ultimately borne by Cameroonian taxpayers.
The danger extends beyond wasted resources. Governance based on personalities rather than institutions undermines accountability. Decisions become difficult to scrutinize because they are perceived as reflecting political influence rather than objective analysis. Public officials should compete in delivering better policy outcomes, not in assembling competing infrastructure projects that appear to represent rival camps within the state.
Cameroon deserves better. The country’s energy future should be guided by comprehensive planning, independent technical assessments, environmental considerations, financial sustainability and measurable public benefit. If two refinery or oil depot proposals exist, the government owes citizens a transparent explanation of their respective merits, costs, financing arrangements and strategic objectives. If only one is justified by national demand and fiscal realities, then resources should be concentrated there through an open and accountable decision-making process.
Strong states are distinguished by institutions that outlast individuals. They do not allow strategic sectors such as petroleum to become theatres for elite competition. The Unity Palace, the SNH, the Ministry of Water and Energy and every relevant public institution should be working from the same blueprint, pursuing the same national objectives and communicating with the same clarity.
Cameroon’s greatest development challenge has never been a shortage of ambition. It has been the persistent gap between institutional governance and personal influence. The current confrontation over refinery and oil depot projects, whatever its underlying dynamics, should serve as a wake-up call. National development cannot be built on competing power centers. It requires unity of purpose, transparency in execution and unwavering fidelity to the public interest.
The country’s oil infrastructure is too important to become another chapter in elite rivalry. Cameroon deserves governance that inspires confidence rather than confusion, coordination rather than competition and institutions that serve the nation rather than personalities who seek to define it.
By Soter Tarh Agbaw-Ebai